A- de 1996
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero
✓Claimant Esperanza Vivas Fonseca
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia para el caso
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
La Corporación no accedió a la petición de nulidad impetrada por la accionante, lo anterior, porque la Corte consideró que no existe causal para que se decrete la nulidad de una sentencia ejecutoriada, proferida dentro de un expediente que ya regresó al juzgado de primera instancia.
No es de la incumbencia de la Corte Constitucional declarar la nulidad de una de sus sentencias para que dicha nulidad surja que los organismos competentes inicien una investigación penal o disciplinaria contra alguien que ni siquiera era el destinatario de la acción.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- No se accede a la petición de nulidad impetrada por Esperanza Vivas Fonseca, de acuerdo a lo expresado en la parte motiva de este auto.
- Notifíquese y cúmplase.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.